Stage 1 - Problem space accepted
There’s a part of this I haven’t seen anyone say out loud. When the person opening the PR gets credit for shipping and the reviewer bears the consequences of reviewing a bad merge, you have a structural problem no tool can solve. That incentive gap widens when the contributor isn’t an engineer building context over time. A PM using an AI coding tool isn’t on a path to owning the service. Unlike a junior engineer who gradually needs less oversight, they’ll need review for every change they make, indefinitely, because they’re not building the kind of context that earns independence. So that review load doesn’t taper but remains a permanent line item, and most teams aren’t planning for it that way.。关于这个话题，safew提供了深入分析
Want to learn more about getting the best out of your tech? Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories and Deals newsletters.。业内人士推荐手游作为进阶阅读
FT Videos & Podcasts